Comparison

Grammarly for English.
WriteX for your region.

If your organization writes only English, Grammarly is a fine tool. The moment Arabic enters the picture, or your data cannot leave the country, the comparison ends quickly.

CriteriaWriteXGrammarly
Arabic proofreadingNone
Arabic morphology & tashkeelNo
English checking
Spanish checkingLimited
Institutional style guidesBrand tones
Hijri dates, dignitary titlesNo
Explains the rule behind fixesSometimes
On-premises deploymentNo
Office + browser + SDK

Comparison based on public documentation of both products; judge with your own text.

The honest version

Different questions, different answers.

Grammarly answers "is my English polished?". WriteX answers "is everything my institution publishes, in Arabic, English, and Spanish, correct, on-standard, and provably improving?". If the second question is yours, the tools are not interchangeable.

shee dont lyk wae how th presentashun was dunshe does not like the way the presentation was done
Style

Both tools catch broken English. Only one also proofreads the Arabic version of the same memo.

AcceptDismiss

Frequently asked questions

Can we run WriteX and Grammarly side by side?

Technically yes, but teams consolidate quickly: one engine, one style guide, and one analytics view across all three languages beats maintaining two subscriptions.

Every word your institution writes, checked.

Official letters to social posts, Arabic to English to Spanish. One assistant that proofreads, enforces your style, and explains every correction, wherever your teams write.

12 error types · Institutional style guides · Works in Office, browsers, and the web editor